Friday, December 9, 2011

New link services too little, too late and blatantly insulting to eastern bus users and ratepayers.


 Metro Christchurch has finally addressed the complete collapse of bus services to large areas of eastern Christchurch following last February's major earthquake.

Ecan has announced two new link bus services to the Dallington, Avonside, Aranui and Avondale areas.

Ecan have introduced a token service, two shuttle links with good route structures but so limited in service spread and frequency schedule they do not even offer peak hour services [see here]
This means high school students and workers will still have to walk 15-20 minutes to get to a city bus stop, despite the fact they or their parents are paying full transport rates to Ecan.

A second fact is if vehicles can negotiate roadworks on this shuttle routes four times a day, why not eight times a day, or sixteen times a day?? The north, west and southern suburbs have almost all city to suburb services running half hourly day/hourly evening, approx twenty five trips each way a day.  

In contrast for these eastern residents, already under stress from quake damage,  to access anywhere in the city they must make a transfer, in most cases at Eastgate or The Palms, and quite possibly another transfer at the city bus exchange to get to work, study or social locations elsewhere. Everyone who has lived through the last nine months of the Council/ Ecan appalling muck up - the disastrous twin bus exchange concept  - knows that double transfer can take hours!  One missed connection at The Palms and some one (including the elderly or those with mobility handicaps) could have to wait two hours to get to Dallington Bridge. Its not on.

The new Links are such a pathetic response, so late, so limited, so insulting to people who pay for an adequate bus service and in some cases depend upon it, one can only be suspicious that The Ecan junta, has got the word from higher up in the National Government that the Nats want to pull the plug on decent public transport and need to drive people away from using buses, downgrade the image and quality of bus services! 

If so the earthquake recovery chaos offering an excellent disguise to do so - these are huge cuts - the biggest I can remember since all evening bus services were reduced 50% in about 1979.  It would be extraordinary to think Ecan could cut bus services so severely - upto 50-70% reduction in some major route corridors NOT blocked by earthquake damage such as Gloucester Street; Tuam Street-Harrow Street; Wainoni Road,  Linwood Avenue without huge outcry if politicians and community leaders were not so distracted with other big issues.

NZ in Tranzit says do the decent thing Metro!!

(a) double the service frequency, even an hourly service is pathetic but it would at least place eastside services on par with some of the other quieter city routes, not a totally inferior service. No body should have to wait two hours for a missed bus or connection!

(b) run services 7am - 8pm minimum. People have to get to work or school or can't visit friends crosstown or shop in the city etc  under  the curfew effect of this ridiculously limited time frame. A public authority elected in part to help the transport disadvantaged and public transport dependent have dignity and freedom of mobility does the opposite and places a tight middle of the day only curfew upon these people.

(c) restore a direct city link to North Linwood  to Woodham Road  area - perhaps an amalgam of the inner suburb parts of the 83-84 routes - why should an eastern route corridor not damaged by earthquakes have a 50% cut (66% if you add in 21,83,84 as previously all offering access to this higher density,  North Linwood/Avonside area) while the people of Ilam, Avonhead, Papanui and Belfast etc etc still get four or more services an hour??  Why should North Linwood, Avonside and Dallington people near undamaged sections of route not have bus services, brought within easier walking range?

Christchurch people pay transport rates (directly or inherent in their rent to landlords) why should the bus user needs and services requirements of the east - the areas that  taken the hardest blow from earthquake effects - already suffering financial stress be be treated with such contempt by people who are paid hundreds of dollars every time they attend a meeting?**



** The Chair of Ecan Dame Margaret Bazley receives $1400 per meeting; the members $900 per meeting. This of course is before tax, presumes they bring to their position superior management skills and spend a lot of time outside the meeting studying reports and analysing and creating effective solutions.

Nine months to organise two very part time vans ? Yeah right!

6 comments:

  1. The problem is not which politicians are in charge of the system, but the fact that it is managed by politicians in the first place.
    Not like the last ECan was any better, to busy organising water-permits for their cronies.

    ReplyDelete
  2. See tories can do public transport. :-)

    http://order-order.com/2011/12/08/boris-bus-will-be-on-time/

    ReplyDelete
  3. I was wrong it is only one van!! I am told that Ecan is extremely constricted for funding which suggests no attempt has been made by the Junta to get extra earthquake recovery support funding from Government, NZTA or other sources. It was pretty clear in the week after Feb 22 many roads were impassable to heavier vehicles and would remain a problem for months and years ahead. Are 10-12 seater transit vans so rare in Australasia that ECan could not have immediately called for a contract to buy or lease a dozen such vans for the next year or two? Nine months to get Leopard to purchase one single mini- bus to serve tens of thousands of eastside residents is shameful, disgusting, appalling. Essentially one side/area of the city is having massive cutbacks to save money for the whole system, even though large sectors of these eastern routes do not have devastating earthquake damage, loss of residents or road rupture making bus services difficult or impossible. Apparently also, those whose rates taxes and fares pay for bus services, and who use and rely upon these buses are not meant to get angry about the way they are being screwed!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Something supports the points made in the posting is that the snow events in Christchurch earlier in the year led to immediate cancellation of all bus services. A key factor in public transport usage is that the service must be reliable - so buses should have been given priority over cars.
    The Central City Plan will be a good test of the government's attitude to public transport. (Only the naive would think that it is the City Council's plan.) The Plan is due out tomorrow.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Are you making money from your exclusive file uploads?
    Did you know that Mgcash will pay you an average of $500 per 1,000 file downloads?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Did you know that that you can make money by locking premium pages of your blog / website?
    Simply join AdWorkMedia and embed their Content Locking tool.

    ReplyDelete